Re: Large tables (was: RAID 0 not as fast as

From: Markus Schaber <schabi(at)logix-tt(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Performance List <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Large tables (was: RAID 0 not as fast as
Date: 2006-09-22 09:13:01
Message-ID: 4513A91D.60501@logix-tt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Hi, Guy,

Guy Thornley wrote:

> Of course you could argue the OS should be able to detect this, and prevent
> it occuring anyway. I don't know anything about linux's behaviour in this
> area.

Yes, one can argue that way.

But a generic Algorithm in the OS can never be as smart as the
application which has more informations about semantics and algorithms.
Everything else would need a crystal ball device :-)

HTH,
Markus

--
Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG
Dipl. Inf. | Software Development GIS

Fight against software patents in Europe! www.ffii.org
www.nosoftwarepatents.org

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-09-22 14:01:14 Re: Large tables (was: RAID 0 not as fast as
Previous Message Arjen van der Meijden 2006-09-22 08:59:27 Re: Opteron vs. Xeon "benchmark"