Re: SEARCH and CYCLE clauses

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SEARCH and CYCLE clauses
Date: 2021-02-27 07:16:13
Message-ID: 450aa025-7a7f-8374-48e1-964a149f0790@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 22.02.21 14:45, Vik Fearing wrote:
> On 2/22/21 1:28 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 22.02.21 11:05, Vik Fearing wrote:
>>> This looks good to me, except that you forgot to add the feature stamp.
>>>   Attached is a small diff to apply on top of your patch to fix that.
>>
>> The feature code is from SQL:202x, whereas the table is relative to
>> SQL:2016.  We could add it, but probably with a comment.
>
> OK.
>

done

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrey Borodin 2021-02-27 07:43:52 Different compression methods for FPI
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2021-02-27 06:08:37 Re: repeated decoding of prepared transactions