Re: Status of funds.postgresql.org?

Dave Page wrote:
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
> To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> Cc: "pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Sent: 15/09/06 21:34
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Status of funds.postgresql.org?
>
>> Hey, if we can host a cms with the features we need at
> www.postgresql.org/community/fundraising, then I'm for it. I was under
>> the impression that that was techincally infeasable.
>
> Why do we need a CMS? The only part needing some thought I can think of would be a secure voting area.

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>> 'cause the Funds Group needs somewhere to park a CMS.
>
> Why does the Funds Group need a separate CMS?
>

Several reasons:

1. Storing of private donation records for reference between officer to
officer
2. Storing of publicized project ideas and plans
3. Dealing with web votes

Neither of these are www suitable for.

Joshua D. Drake

>
> /D
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/