Re: proposal: new polymorphic types - commontype and commontypearray

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: proposal: new polymorphic types - commontype and commontypearray
Date: 2020-03-18 01:45:35
Message-ID: 4509.1584495935@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> The cfbot will be unhappy at this point, but I need to rebase the
> main patch again ...

And rebased. Still not quite happy about some of the details in
enforce_generic_type_consistency, and I've not looked at the test
cases or documentation at all. But this should make the cfbot
happy.

regards, tom lane

Attachment Content-Type Size
anycompatible-types-20200317.patch text/x-diff 57.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-03-18 01:47:54 Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach)
Previous Message yuzuko 2020-03-18 01:06:45 Re: Autovacuum on partitioned table