| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joshua Reich <josh(at)root(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Rocco Altier <RoccoA(at)Routescape(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: another try at keeping AIX/ppc |
| Date: | 2006-07-27 20:53:44 |
| Message-ID: | 44C927D8.8010502@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Joshua Reich wrote:
> I just updated to the latest HEAD, so I assume I have the cube_1.out
> that you changed. If you look at the order of the results expected in
> cube.out and cube_1.out, they are different. So I don't think we have
> a problem with the code, we just need to fix the ordering in cube_1.out.
>
The version where I reverted the change is 1.6.
There is apparently a code problem somehow, since we know that AIX/PPC
at least orders things differently on those 2 tests.
I have looked at the new code and can't see any obvious reason for
ordering differences.
Maybe we need to try to stress test the comparison routines a bit to
make sure they really are deterministic.
> The same problem appears in cube_2.out -- is this used by any platform?
>
>
We will deal with that one in due course.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-07-27 21:01:37 | Re: lastval exposes information that currval does not |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-07-27 20:45:57 | Warnings in pgstattuple |