Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Best high availability solution ?

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Arnaud Lesauvage <thewild(at)freesurf(dot)fr>
Cc: Stuart Bishop <stuart(at)stuartbishop(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Best high availability solution ?
Date: 2006-05-31 15:47:03
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-general
> I agree with you, but I will have two servers : one will be the file 
> server, the primary controller of the active directory, and the backup 
> of postgresql; the other one will be the postgresql server and the 
> backup of the file server and active directory.
> So restoring from this situation does not only require postgresql 
> knoledge, it requires a full understanding of our network structure, 
> applications, configurations, etc...

> But you have a point that having a contact for postgresql support is a 
> very good idea anyway !

Here ya go:

(DISCLAIMER: I represent the company)

Joshua D. Drake

> -- 
> Arnaud
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
>       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
>       match


    === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
    Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997

In response to


pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Ludwig Isaac LimDate: 2006-05-31 16:15:35
Subject: Re: PGSQL 7.4 -> 8.1 migration & performance problem
Previous:From: Chris BrowneDate: 2006-05-31 15:39:28
Subject: Re: SCSI disk: still the way to go?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group