Re: Best high availability solution ?

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Arnaud Lesauvage <thewild(at)freesurf(dot)fr>
Cc: Stuart Bishop <stuart(at)stuartbishop(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Best high availability solution ?
Date: 2006-05-31 15:47:03
Message-ID: 447DBA77.40703@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


> I agree with you, but I will have two servers : one will be the file
> server, the primary controller of the active directory, and the backup
> of postgresql; the other one will be the postgresql server and the
> backup of the file server and active directory.
> So restoring from this situation does not only require postgresql
> knoledge, it requires a full understanding of our network structure,
> applications, configurations, etc...

> But you have a point that having a contact for postgresql support is a
> very good idea anyway !

Here ya go:

http://www.commandprompt.com/support

(DISCLAIMER: I represent the company)

Joshua D. Drake

>
> --
> Arnaud
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> match
>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ludwig Isaac Lim 2006-05-31 16:15:35 Re: PGSQL 7.4 -> 8.1 migration & performance problem
Previous Message Chris Browne 2006-05-31 15:39:28 Re: SCSI disk: still the way to go?