Tom Lane wrote:
> "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> your time of 150 ms is looking like the slow case on my results.
> Yeah... so what's wrong with my test? Anyone else care to duplicate
> the test and see what they get?
Using your test [generating c from int(rand(1000))], I get 230 ms using
5.0.18 on a P3 1000 Mhz (doing optimize table on t made no difference at
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Brendan Duddridge||Date: 2006-05-28 09:37:57|
|Subject: App very unresponsive while performing simple update|
|Previous:||From: PFC||Date: 2006-05-27 21:04:51|
|Subject: Re: Speed Up Offset and Limit Clause|