Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: plpython improvements

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Sven Suursoho <sven(at)spam(dot)pri(dot)ee>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: plpython improvements
Date: 2006-05-05 18:56:44
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
> As an example of absurdity of this problem: let's assume there is known 
> distribution with buggy gethostbyname(). Fact, that we know about this, 
> shouldn't stop us developing TCP/IP applications. Especially, if there 
> is also patch for this bug :)
> It would be real shame to prevent using generator for SETOF functions 
> because it is most natural match for plpgsql's "return next"

All I was saying was that we need to account for the use of 2.4 :). So 
as long as we document (as you suggest) we should be good. Sorry if I 
wasn't clear.


Joshua D. Drake

> --Sven Suursoho


            === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
      Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
      Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-05-05 19:01:52
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Don't try to compile SSL CRL support
Previous:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2006-05-05 18:55:32
Subject: Re: Page at a time index scan

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group