From: | Theo Schlossnagle <jesus(at)omniti(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Solaris ASM problem |
Date: | 2006-04-28 21:30:59 |
Message-ID: | 44528993.2040508@omniti.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Kris Jurka wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, Theo Schlossnagle wrote:
>
>> The file that uses the spinlocks:
>> /src/backend/storage/lmgr/s_lock.c
>>
>> can be compiled standalone with -DS_LOCK_TEST
>>
>
> To get the test to compile I had to link in tas.o as the attached
> patch shows. Unfortunately this doesn't work for platforms that don't
> have a tas.o, bailing out with file not found. Perhaps it's not
> important to fix this test, but I thought I'd mention it.
>
> Anyway the test exits with
>
> Stuck spinlock (80618e9) detected at ./s_lock.c:355.
>
> on a linux gcc build this exits with
>
> Stuck spinlock (0x5013ad) detected at ./s_lock.c:402.
This seems like a different problem, no? The patch I sent in didn't
touch any of the linux assembly bits. The linux test should pass to the
end without an issue right?
--
// Theo Schlossnagle
// Principal Engineer -- http://www.omniti.com/~jesus/
// Ecelerity: Run with it. -- http://www.omniti.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kris Jurka | 2006-04-28 21:38:39 | Re: Solaris ASM problem |
Previous Message | Kris Jurka | 2006-04-28 21:18:49 | Re: Solaris ASM problem |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kris Jurka | 2006-04-28 21:38:39 | Re: Solaris ASM problem |
Previous Message | Kris Jurka | 2006-04-28 21:18:49 | Re: Solaris ASM problem |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kris Jurka | 2006-04-28 21:38:39 | Re: Solaris ASM problem |
Previous Message | Kris Jurka | 2006-04-28 21:18:49 | Re: Solaris ASM problem |