Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Has this been addressed?
IIRC, I looked at the patch and decided it was okay.
regards, tom lane
>> "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> The latest patch we submitted to the fulltextindex module improved lots of
> things but something we could not get to work was the apparently correct use
> of the PG_GETARG* macros, etc.
> Whenever we used these macros, we always got 0 or NULL as our values. So,
> we reverted to the trigger->tgargs array.
>> Trigger functions don't get their arguments the normal way. The GETARG
>> macros don't know anything about trigger arguments... so the original
>> code was correct as it was. I haven't had time to look at your patch,
>> but maybe I should go do that.
>> regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: mlw||Date: 2001-09-06 23:28:03|
|Subject: Great Bridge|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2001-09-06 20:47:06|
|Subject: Re: FTI contrib|