Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Dmitry Karasik wrote:
>>> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>>> Is this patch going to be applied?
>>> I am waiting for an update from Dmitry.
>> I believe this is some kind of misunderstanding, sorry if from my part,
>> but I don't think any further updates are necessary.
> OK, I'll take another look. I'm still curious to know why pltcl
> doesn't need to call spi_free_plan. Maybe it does need to ...
I have committed the patch and docs for this - it's an important feature
and I would like people banging on it.
I'd like to review the API we provide to plperl, though - I don't like
it much. I think that should be an 8.2 TODO.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Pierre Racine||Date: 2006-03-05 17:13:11|
|Subject: Defining my own operator's precedence|
|Previous:||From: Michael Fuhr||Date: 2006-03-05 16:30:26|
|Subject: Re: Deleting loid from the database|
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Markus Bertheau||Date: 2006-03-05 17:34:10|
|Subject: TODO item: remove postmaster -o option|
|Previous:||From: Pavel Stehule||Date: 2006-03-05 08:25:49|
|Subject: Re: INS/UPD/DEL RETURNING for 8.2|