Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: implement prepared queries in plperl

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: dmitry(at)karasik(dot)eu(dot)org
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: implement prepared queries in plperl
Date: 2006-03-05 16:45:58
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches

Andrew Dunstan wrote:

> Dmitry Karasik wrote:
>>> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>>> Is this patch going to be applied?
>>> I am waiting for an update from Dmitry.
>>> cheers
>>> andrew
>> I believe this is some kind of misunderstanding, sorry if from my part,
>> but I don't think any further updates are necessary.
> OK, I'll take another look. I'm still curious to know why pltcl 
> doesn't need to call spi_free_plan. Maybe it does need to ...

I have committed the patch and docs for this - it's an important feature 
and I would like people banging on it.

I'd like to review the API we provide to plperl, though - I don't like 
it much. I think that should be an 8.2 TODO.



In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Pierre RacineDate: 2006-03-05 17:13:11
Subject: Defining my own operator's precedence
Previous:From: Michael FuhrDate: 2006-03-05 16:30:26
Subject: Re: Deleting loid from the database

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Markus BertheauDate: 2006-03-05 17:34:10
Subject: TODO item: remove postmaster -o option
Previous:From: Pavel StehuleDate: 2006-03-05 08:25:49
Subject: Re: INS/UPD/DEL RETURNING for 8.2

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group