Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Production version of ODBC drivers

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Mark Morgan Lloyd <markMLl(dot)pgsql-odbc(at)telemetry(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Production version of ODBC drivers
Date: 2006-02-20 18:13:06
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-odbc
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Am Montag, 20. Februar 2006 11:59 schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd:
>>> Is there a URL showing which Win-32 ODBC binary is considered sufficiently
>>> stable for production use?
>> The latest one on the FTP server is the recommended one.
> Yes, but /which/ FTP server and /where/? The last one I pulled was (I think)
> when Hiroshi was still in charge, and since then as I understand it it's passed
> through at least one set of hands- plus recent discussion I see here which
> suggests that the project has forked into ODBC vs ODBCng.
No. There is no fork. There are two FOSS open source drivers:

1. ODBC which can be had from any of the PostgreSQL mirrors
2. ODBCng which is a brand new (not finished yet) driver for PostgreSQL.

ODBCng can be found here:


Joshua D. Drake

The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: PLphp, PLperl -

In response to

pgsql-odbc by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2006-02-20 18:18:06
Subject: Re: ANSI and Unicode driver
Previous:From: Hiroshi InoueDate: 2006-02-20 18:08:40
Subject: Re: ANSI and Unicode driver

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group