Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: ODBC and pgpool

From: Mark Morgan Lloyd <markMLl(dot)pgsql-odbc(at)telemetry(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ODBC and pgpool
Date: 2006-02-01 11:21:02
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-odbc
Many thanks. Not the most desirable situation but at least it's a clear answer.

My current situation is that I'm using Delphi on the clients, this has
data-aware components that adopt undefined (or at the very least inconvenient
:-) states when no longer connected to the underlying database. However I have
aother reasons to want to discard these, so this becomes just one more factor to
consider in the redesign.

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> > If a Win-32 system connects via ODBC to pgpool, does the system
> > running pgpool have to be permanently running or can it be rebooted
> > without deranging open but quiescent connections?
> No, your application will have to be able to reconnect if the connection
> is lost by reason of the "server" disappearing or having been moved.

Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. .DOT. uk

[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]

In response to


pgsql-odbc by date

Next:From: Ben TrewernDate: 2006-02-01 11:28:46
Subject: Re: ODBC and pgpool
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2006-02-01 07:30:42
Subject: Re: ODBC and pgpool

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group