Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Infrastructure monitoring

From: Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: John Hansen <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au>,Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>,Guido Barosio <gbarosio(at)gmail(dot)com>,"Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>,Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org,"Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Infrastructure monitoring
Date: 2006-01-15 21:04:20
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-www
Joshua D. Drake schrieb:
> Hello,
> ...
> Why do we "need" a separate server for the cgi's? Are they that hard on
> the webserver?

Maybe not using cgi would help?  You can run webapp and postgres on the
same server but putting them on separate servers really helps with
having performance high. But it really depends on the application.

In response to

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: John HansenDate: 2006-01-15 21:08:53
Subject: Re: Infrastructure monitoring
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2006-01-15 20:47:16
Subject: Re: Infrastructure monitoring

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group