Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Minor doc tweak: "NOT NULL" is

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Minor doc tweak: "NOT NULL" is
Date: 2005-12-29 07:14:03
Message-ID: 43B38CBB.4040701@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

> Why? SERIAL implies NOT NULL (although PRIMARY KEY does as well, of
> course).

Ah yes you're right. I mixed up with the fact that SERIAL no longer
implies UNIQUE...

Chris

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-12-29 14:28:31 pgsql: Move declaration of check_function_bodies to where the perl
Previous Message Neil Conway 2005-12-29 07:01:50 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Minor doc tweak: "NOT NULL" is

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dmitry Panov 2005-12-29 07:47:54 Re: [GENERAL] WAL logs multiplexing?
Previous Message Neil Conway 2005-12-29 07:01:50 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Minor doc tweak: "NOT NULL" is