| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ron <rjpeace(at)earthlink(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Frank Wiles <frank(at)wiles(dot)org>, Juan Casero <caseroj(at)comcast(dot)net>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: What's the best hardver for PostgreSQL 8.1? |
| Date: | 2005-12-24 21:42:00 |
| Message-ID: | 43ADC0A8.20503@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
>
> If you've got the budget or are dealing with small enough physical
> storage needs, by all means use RAID 10. OTOH, if you are dealing
> with large enterprise class apps like Sarbanes Oxley compliance,
> medical and/or insurance, etc, etc, the storage needs can get so large
> that RAID 10 for everything or even most things is not possible. Even
> if economically feasible.
>
> RAID levels are like any other tool. Each is useful in the proper
> circumstances.
>
There is also RAID 50 which is quite nice.
Joshua D. Drake
> Happy holidays,
> Ron Peacetree
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
--
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: PLphp, PLperl - http://www.commandprompt.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Lang | 2005-12-24 21:54:21 | Re: What's the best hardver for PostgreSQL 8.1? |
| Previous Message | Ron | 2005-12-24 21:31:30 | Re: What's the best hardver for PostgreSQL 8.1? |