| From: | "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, Guillaume LELARGE <guillaume(dot)lelarge(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Schema bug |
| Date: | 2005-12-12 23:29:01 |
| Message-ID: | 439E07BD.1060504@phlo.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Florian G. Pflug wrote:
>> I'd prefer system-catalogs being excluded by name - preferably the
>> exclusion-list would be editable, and part of the pgadmin preferences.
>> Seems more transparent to me - and future-proof, in the sense that
>> even if a future postgres version chooses to rename some catalog, the
>> user will be able to just add the new names to the exclusion list.
>
> There's already a database restriction and a schema restriction, just
> use it.
Ups... Should have checked before posting... Doesn't invalidate my
point, though ;-)
BTW, I just checked the postgresql CVS, and found the in the beginnings
of schema-support in pgsql, the public schema had oid 2071. It got
changed to 2200 before 7.3 was released, though.
greetings, Florian Pflug
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-12-12 23:37:54 | Re: Schema bug |
| Previous Message | Andreas Pflug | 2005-12-12 23:00:58 | Re: Schema bug |