Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases
Date: 2005-12-01 04:22:52
Message-ID: 438E7A9C.3010201@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www


>>
>> I see this as an excellent reason to draw a bright, sharp line between
>> what vendors support and what the community as a whole does,
>> especially where individual community members wear another hat.
>
>
> So, if Sun, SRA, Pervasive, Command Prompt, etc were to submit a patch
> for v7.2, we'd refuse it? I think not ...

Oh but you should. The community has enough to worry about.

Joshua D. Drake

--
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: PLphp, PLperl - http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-12-01 04:38:48 Another way to reduce pg_subtrans lookup overhead
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-12-01 04:20:52 Re: Problem with COPY CSV

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2005-12-01 05:15:59 Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-12-01 03:56:33 Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases