From: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core? |
Date: | 2005-04-05 08:44:17 |
Message-ID: | 4379.24.211.165.134.1112690657.squirrel@www.dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Greg Sabino Mullane said:
>
>> Other languages don't require PG to be installed in order to compile
>> them. For example, you can build Perl (with no Postgres on the
>> system), build Postgres and then build DBD::Pg as a completely
>> separate step.
>
> Just so we are all on the same sheet of music, DBD::Pg is a completely
> different animal from Pl/Perl
I think everybody gets that.
> and really has nothing to do with the
> discussion of adding Pl/PHP to the core.
>
It's relevant because it's the *client* side support in PHP that creates a
build dependency of PHP on Postgres. As was being pointed out above, Perl
doesn't suffer from this defect.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2005-04-05 09:02:20 | Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? |
Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2005-04-05 08:43:29 | Re: insert woes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2005-04-05 09:02:20 | Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? |
Previous Message | Russell Smith | 2005-04-05 08:06:09 | Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? |