Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core?

From: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core?
Date: 2005-04-05 08:44:17
Message-ID: 4379.24.211.165.134.1112690657.squirrel@www.dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Greg Sabino Mullane said:

>

>> Other languages don't require PG to be installed in order to compile
>> them. For example, you can build Perl (with no Postgres on the
>> system), build Postgres and then build DBD::Pg as a completely
>> separate step.
>

> Just so we are all on the same sheet of music, DBD::Pg is a completely
> different animal from Pl/Perl

I think everybody gets that.

> and really has nothing to do with the
> discussion of adding Pl/PHP to the core.
>

It's relevant because it's the *client* side support in PHP that creates a
build dependency of PHP on Postgres. As was being pointed out above, Perl
doesn't suffer from this defect.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2005-04-05 09:02:20 Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?
Previous Message Richard Huxton 2005-04-05 08:43:29 Re: insert woes

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2005-04-05 09:02:20 Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?
Previous Message Russell Smith 2005-04-05 08:06:09 Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?