Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Advice on RAID card

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: PFC <lists(at)boutiquenumerique(dot)com>
Cc: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>,Michael Ben-Nes <miki(at)canaan(dot)co(dot)il>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Advice on RAID card
Date: 2005-09-25 16:22:02
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
>     Even for RAID5 ? it uses a bit more CPU for the parity calculations.

I honestly can't speak to RAID 5. I don't (and won't) use it. RAID 5 is 
a little brutal when under
heavy write load. I use either 1, or 10.

>     An advantage of software raid, is that if the RAID card dies, you 
> have to  buy the same one ; whether I think that you can transfer a 
> bunch of  software RAID5 disks to another machine if the machine 
> they're in dies...

There is a huge advantage to software raid on all kinds of levels. If 
you have the CPU then I suggest
it. However you will never get the performance out of software raid on 
the high level (think 1 gig of cache)
that you would on a software raid setup.

It is a bit of a tradeoff but for most installations software raid is 
more than adequate.


Joshua D. Drake

Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG -

In response to


pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: PFCDate: 2005-09-25 16:53:57
Subject: Re: Advice on RAID card
Previous:From: PFCDate: 2005-09-25 16:08:27
Subject: Re: Advice on RAID card

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group