| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] no universally correct setting for fsync |
| Date: | 2010-05-08 00:13:32 |
| Message-ID: | 4335.1273277612@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> This is what I have to replace the current fsync entry in config.sgml.
s/unexpected shutdown/system crash/, perhaps. The wording you have
suggests that a forced Postgres stoppage produces a problem, which it
doesn't. It takes a failure at the OS level or below to cause a
problem.
> I believe that the note about needing fsync for Warm Standby to work
> correctly is true, but could someone verify it?
AFAIK that's nonsense. The filesystem state that pg_standby could see
will be updated in any case; pg_standby has no direct access to the bits
on the platters, any more than Postgres does.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bernd Helmle | 2010-05-08 00:16:23 | Re: no universally correct setting for fsync |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-05-08 00:02:59 | Re: [HACKERS] no universally correct setting for fsync |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bernd Helmle | 2010-05-08 00:16:23 | Re: no universally correct setting for fsync |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-05-08 00:02:59 | Re: [HACKERS] no universally correct setting for fsync |