Re: Planner create a slow plan without an available index

From: Ben-Nes Yonatan <da(at)canaan(dot)co(dot)il>
To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Planner create a slow plan without an available index
Date: 2005-08-31 07:36:04
Message-ID: 43155DE4.1030004@canaan.co.il
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 09:19:05AM +0200, Ben-Nes Yonatan wrote:
>
>>>If the subtransaction writes at least a tuple, it counts as another
>>>transaction. Else it doesn't count.
>>>
>>
>>Oh crap I fear that now im in serious troubles....
>>Where can I read about this limitation? and beside that what if I count
>>the number of queries and every 900,000 or so I create a subtransaction
>>and continue my process with it, will that work or I'm just trying to be
>>a smart ass with the db?
>
>
> Um, 1 billion transactions is 1 thousand million. So 900,000
> inserts/updates are not even one tenth of one percent of the limit for
> one transaction.
>
> Are you really approaching a billion inserts/updates per transaction?
> That's alot of diskspace being used...
>
> Have a nice day,

No apprantly I just lack a decent sleep.... I think that ill stop ask
you guys questions before you will decide to get your clubs out... :P
In other words I was mistaken and thought about a million and not a
billion :)

With hopes that this is the end of my bugging :)
Thanks alot,
Ben-Nes Yonatan

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthew Peter 2005-08-31 07:50:20 Re: optimum settings for dedicated box
Previous Message Ben-Nes Yonatan 2005-08-31 07:19:05 Re: Planner create a slow plan without an available index