Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: per user/database connections limit again

From: Petr Jelinek <pjmodos(at)parba(dot)cz>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: per user/database connections limit again
Date: 2005-07-25 17:14:44
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian wrote:

>The new syntax for this command is CREATE/ALTER DATABASE/USER:
>                | MAX CONNECTIONS Iconst
>This adds 'max' as a keyword, though at a fairly unreserved level, I
>think.  Should we use the syntax LIMIT CONNECTIONS so we don't have to
>add MAX as a keyword at all?
Yeah I have no problem with LIMIT CONNECTIONS, will you change it or 
should I do it ?

btw where has new keyword to be added to not be added "at a fairly 
unreserved level" ? (MAX is also added to keywords.c in that patch)

Petr Jelinek (PJMODOS)

In response to


pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Rocco AltierDate: 2005-07-25 17:17:08
Subject: Re: Proposed patch to remove .so pattern rules from platform Makefiles
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-07-25 17:12:01
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Roles - SET ROLE Updated

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group