Re: PL/PGSQL: Dynamic Record Introspection

From: Titus von Boxberg <ut(at)bhi-hamburg(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PL/PGSQL: Dynamic Record Introspection
Date: 2005-07-24 10:06:39
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-patches

Tom Lane schrieb:
> "Titus von Boxberg" <ut(at)bhi-hamburg(dot)de> writes:
> It works for me if we want to have an "NFIELDS" construct. Personally
> I'm still not convinced that we need one --- what's the use-case?
I have removed the NFIELDS construct
> I'd prefer arbitrary expression, but I suppose there's no harm in doing
> the simple case first and generalizing if there's demand.
I took the "no harm" way.

Attached please find the updated patch.
The patch is against HEAD of 050721.

I switched the syntax to your proposal, renamed the functions
in pl_comp.c and updated the sgml doc source and regression
test files accordingly.


Attachment Content-Type Size
ar-current050720.patch text/plain 22.5 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Petr Jelinek 2005-07-24 12:46:13 Re: per user/database connections limit again
Previous Message Rocco Altier 2005-07-24 05:49:26 Regression - GNUmakefile - pg_usleep