Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PL/PGSQL: Dynamic Record Introspection

From: Titus von Boxberg <ut(at)bhi-hamburg(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PL/PGSQL: Dynamic Record Introspection
Date: 2005-07-24 10:06:39
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
Tom Lane schrieb:
> "Titus von Boxberg" <ut(at)bhi-hamburg(dot)de> writes:
> It works for me if we want to have an "NFIELDS" construct.  Personally
> I'm still not convinced that we need one --- what's the use-case?
I have removed the NFIELDS construct
> I'd prefer arbitrary expression, but I suppose there's no harm in doing
> the simple case first and generalizing if there's demand.
I took the "no harm" way.

Attached please find the updated patch.
The patch is against HEAD of 050721.

I switched the syntax to your proposal, renamed the functions
in pl_comp.c and updated the sgml doc source and regression
test files accordingly.


Attachment: ar-current050720.patch
Description: text/plain (22.5 KB)

In response to


pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Petr JelinekDate: 2005-07-24 12:46:13
Subject: Re: per user/database connections limit again
Previous:From: Rocco AltierDate: 2005-07-24 05:49:26
Subject: Regression - GNUmakefile - pg_usleep

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group