Re: [HACKERS] Patch to fix plpython on OS X

Tom Lane wrote:

>"Jim C. Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> writes:
>
>
>>On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 10:03:39AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"Jim C. Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> writes:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Attached is a plpython_error_1.out file that will fix cuckoo.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>What is the reason for the difference in the error message spelling
>>>in the first place? Is this a Python version thing (and if so,
>>>which version is newer --- that should have pride of place as
>>>plpython_error.out I should think)? Or is there some other reason
>>>that we need to understand more closely instead of just slapping on
>>>a band-aid?
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>>I don't think it's a version issue; cuckoo is at 2.4, platypus used to
>>be at 2.3 but I upgraded it to 2.4 to see if that was the issue, but
>>platypus kept working.
>>
>>
>
>Hmm ... if it's *not* a version thing then I really do want to know
>what's causing it. Anyone have an idea why this machine is saying
>'\u80' where everyone else's python says u'\x80' ?
>
>
>
>
>

Another OSX box on buildfarm, wallaroo, is exhibiting the same
behaviour, albeit currently masked by interval regression failures.

cheers

andrew