Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Speed with offset clause

From: John A Meinel <john(at)arbash-meinel(dot)com>
To: Yves Vindevogel <yves(dot)vindevogel(at)implements(dot)be>,pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Speed with offset clause
Date: 2005-06-24 19:22:07
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
Yves Vindevogel wrote:

> Hi again all,
> My queries are now optimised. They all use the indexes like they should.
> However, there's still a slight problem when I issue the "offset" clause.
> We have a table that contains 600.000 records
> We display them by 25 in the webpage.
> So, when I want the last page, which is: 600k / 25 = page 24000 - 1 = 
> 23999, I issue the offset of 23999 * 25
> This take a long time to run, about 5-10 seconds whereas offset below 
> 100 take less than a second.
> Can I speed this up ?
> Met vriendelijke groeten,
> Bien à vous,
> Kind regards,
> *Yves Vindevogel*
> *Implements*
Postgres has the optimization that it will plan a query, and once it 
reaches the limit, it can stop even though there is more data available.
The problem you are having is that it has to go through "offset" rows 
first, before it can apply the limit.
If you can, (as mentioned in the other post), try to refine your index 
so that you can reverse it for the second half of the data.

This is probably tricky, as you may not know how many rows you have (or 
the amount might be changing).

A potentially better thing, is if you have an index you are using, you 
could use a subselect so that the only portion that needs to have 60k 
rows is a single column.

Maybe an example:
Instead of saying:


You could do:

    (SELECT id FROM table1 OFFSET x LIMIT 25) as subselect
    JOIN table1 ON =
    , table2
    WHERE =;

That means that the culling process is done on only a few rows of one 
table, and the rest of the real merging work is done on only a few rows.

It really depends on you query, though, as what rows you are sorting on 
has a big influence on how well this will work.


In response to


pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Rod TaylorDate: 2005-06-24 19:24:05
Subject: Re: max_connections / shared_buffers /
Previous:From: John A MeinelDate: 2005-06-24 19:16:02
Subject: Re: max_connections / shared_buffers / effective_cache_size

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group