Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: NOLOGGING option, or ?

From: Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>
To: Alon Goldshuv <agoldshuv(at)greenplum(dot)com>
Cc: Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: NOLOGGING option, or ?
Date: 2005-06-02 06:14:04
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Alon Goldshuv wrote:

> I think that the basic issue is that there are some database users that would like to take their data and put it into the database without pre-processing it [...]
> The only responsibility of these users is to explicitly escape any delimiter or 0x0A (LF) characters that they intend to have as DATA. that's all. 

Haven't you just replaced one preprocessing step with another, then?


In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Teodor SigaevDate: 2005-06-02 06:46:44
Subject: Re: Drop separate CRC32 implementations in ltree, tsearch,
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-06-02 06:00:17
Subject: Drop separate CRC32 implementations in ltree, tsearch, tsearch2?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group