Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: plperl strict mode

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)surnet(dot)cl>
Cc: "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plperl strict mode
Date: 2005-05-24 16:29:43
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches

Alvaro Herrera wrote:

>Yes, you can register a function as "validator" during language
>creation.  AFAIR there are no validator functions except SQL and
>plpgsql, so you would have to create one for plperl ...

Excellent. We'll definitely work on that. Not having this has annoyed me 
(and I'm sure others) in the past.



In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-05-24 17:09:34
Subject: Re: plperl tests for currently untested features
Previous:From: Matthew T. O'ConnorDate: 2005-05-24 16:15:26
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pg_autovacuum commandline password hiding.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group