| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement |
| Date: | 2005-04-28 05:48:42 |
| Message-ID: | 4270793A.5050302@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
>
> Do companies want to write for Blue Hat PostgreSQL and Suza PostgreSQL
> because that might be what happens if we don't stay organized? In fact,
> it might have be happening already.
Well that depends... If the companies are writing for Pervasive
PostgreSQL I don't think they would have a problem with that ;).
And I do agree with you Bruce, it is happening already -- I don't think
there is any question in that.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
--
Your PostgreSQL solutions provider, Command Prompt, Inc.
24x7 support - 1.800.492.2240, programming, and consulting
Home of PostgreSQL Replicator, plPHP, plPerlNG and pgPHPToolkit
http://www.commandprompt.com / http://www.postgresql.org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-04-28 05:56:30 | Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-04-28 05:30:30 | Re: Increased company involvement |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-04-28 05:56:30 | Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement |
| Previous Message | Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD | 2005-04-28 05:45:46 | Re: DO INSTEAD and conditional rules |