| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents |
| Date: | 2005-04-22 04:21:09 |
| Message-ID: | 42687BB5.9070603@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
>>>I personally know the patent system is a mess, but it is not an
>>>overriding issue in my work with PostgreSQL.
>>
>>Your work with PostgreSQL (AFAIK) wouldn't run into the problem. People
>>like Berkus, myself, EnterpriseDB, Greenplumn, SRA (Yes I know they
>>employ you), PgSQL, Inc., are who are going to run into the problem.
>>
>>All due respect but perhaps it is worth considering the issue as a total
>>community versus just how it affects you.
>
>
> Yea, I have been at this for nine years because I look at all issues
> only from my perspective. Do you honestly believe that?
Normally no, but your comment was :
but it is not an overriding issue in my work with PostgreSQL.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-04-22 04:22:00 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-04-22 04:18:29 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-04-22 04:22:00 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-04-22 04:18:29 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents |