| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
| Cc: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Psql_General (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? |
| Date: | 2005-04-04 21:32:48 |
| Message-ID: | 4251B280.6030600@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 04:48:50PM -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
>
>
>The problem is that even if you could build a Postgres support package
>for PHP without building the whole PHP (which you _can_ do AFAIK), it
>means that you need to make a second pass at the PHP source RPM, which
>will be probably rejected by packagers.
>
>
FYI this is supposedly fixed in 5.1.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
>I think the problem could be solved if we were to include PHP in the
>main CVS, but not distribute it in the same tarball. So the code is
>kept where it really belongs, and we allow building both things
>separately for the packagers' sake.
>
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | YL | 2005-04-04 22:49:49 | cygwin and psql |
| Previous Message | David Link | 2005-04-04 21:26:25 | Re: diskspace usage recovered on db rebuild |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2005-04-04 22:47:42 | Re: Notes on lock table spilling |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2005-04-04 21:19:46 | Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? |