Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Marco Colombo <pgsql(at)esiway(dot)net>
Cc: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?
Date: 2005-04-04 15:03:50
Message-ID: 42515756.3030604@commandprompt.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers


>>
>> Sorry, but I don't buy it.
>
>
> I do. Actually I think no database is complete because no one includes
> LISP as a procedural language (pun on "procedural" intented).
> (BTW, I have no idea if a pl/LISP module ever existed.)

O.k. this is just a little sick ;0... Module-2 here I come.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
> .TM.

--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL

Attachment Content-Type Size
jd.vcf text/x-vcard 285 bytes

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-04-04 15:14:02 Re: field definitions in view results?
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-04-04 15:02:30 Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2005-04-04 15:20:25 Unicode problems on IRC
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-04-04 15:02:30 Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?