From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Marco Colombo <pgsql(at)esiway(dot)net> |
Cc: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? |
Date: | 2005-04-04 15:03:50 |
Message-ID: | 42515756.3030604@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
>>
>> Sorry, but I don't buy it.
>
>
> I do. Actually I think no database is complete because no one includes
> LISP as a procedural language (pun on "procedural" intented).
> (BTW, I have no idea if a pl/LISP module ever existed.)
O.k. this is just a little sick ;0... Module-2 here I come.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> .TM.
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
jd.vcf | text/x-vcard | 285 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-04-04 15:14:02 | Re: field definitions in view results? |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-04-04 15:02:30 | Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2005-04-04 15:20:25 | Unicode problems on IRC |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-04-04 15:02:30 | Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? |