Re: [HACKERS] contrib/pg_buffercache

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] contrib/pg_buffercache
Date: 2005-03-31 06:56:52
Message-ID: 424B9F34.6090802@samurai.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> Great that it fixes it... however, I had submitted a tidier patch that
> puts the macro in the header

How is this tidier?

(I don't see a reason for pg_buffercache_pages.h at all, actually.)

-Neil

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message shingav 2005-03-31 08:05:04 Understanding pg_xlog
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-03-31 06:06:39 Re: HEAD \df doesn't show functions with no arguments

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Kirkwood 2005-03-31 08:25:32 Re: [HACKERS] contrib/pg_buffercache
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-03-31 06:06:39 Re: HEAD \df doesn't show functions with no arguments