Tom Lane wrote:
> Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
>>Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>>>How is what you're suggesting more portable?
>>Well, the driver would be free to implement $sth->last_insert_id() using
>>whatever proprietary extensions it has available. The non-portableness would
>>at least be hidden in the driver layer.
> Are you asserting that last_insert_id() is a portable function? I doubt
I'm not familiar with the Perl interface, but JDBC has a standardized
interface for this:
I tend to agree that a protocol-level change is easier to support in a
driver. If it's done by extending INSERT/UPDATE, the driver will need to
parse and modify queries which is hairy at the best of times.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2005-02-02 21:04:27|
|Subject: Re: [NOVICE] Last ID Problem |
|Previous:||From: Martin Pitt||Date: 2005-02-02 20:42:28|
|Subject: Re: libpq API incompatibility between 7.4 and 8.0|