Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering

From: Matt Clark <matt(at)ymogen(dot)net>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering
Date: 2005-01-21 09:16:08
Message-ID: 41F0C858.7070508@ymogen.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Presumably it can't _ever_ know without being explicitly told, because
even for a plain SELECT there might be triggers involved that update
tables, or it might be a select of a stored proc, etc. So in the
general case, you can't assume that a select doesn't cause an update,
and you can't be sure that the table list in an update is a complete
list of the tables that might be updated.

Tatsuo Ishii wrote:

>Can I ask a question?
>
>Suppose table A gets updated on the master at time 00:00. Until 00:03
>pgpool needs to send all queries regarding A to the master only. My
>question is, how can pgpool know a query is related to A?
>--
>Tatsuo Ishii
>
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrei Bintintan 2005-01-21 09:20:48 Re: [SQL] OFFSET impact on Performance???
Previous Message Matt Casters 2005-01-21 08:50:46 Re: