| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, "T(dot)J(dot)" <tjtoocool(at)phreaker(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] More SSL questions.. |
| Date: | 2005-01-10 17:17:12 |
| Message-ID: | 41E2B898.2060802@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
>At this point, Andrew, Magnus, and I who deal with Win32 regularly all
>feel *.conf is more logical than *.txt. I have not heard anyone say
>*.txt is better except Tom. Is that enough of a vote?
>
>
>
*ahem* :-) I though what I said was that we should leave the name alone
except for removing a leading dot. I have seen other cases where .foorc
became foo.rc on windows, which isn't a bad solution for such files.
I honestly don't care that much - it's not worth a religious fight over.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-01-10 19:37:44 | Re: PG 8.0: the launch clock is running |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-01-10 16:39:53 | Re: "SMgrRelation hashtable corrupted" failure identified |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2005-01-10 21:46:46 | More Code Page wierdness |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-01-10 16:20:17 | Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] More SSL questions.. |