Re: Postgres Database Design Issues in Tablespace

From: Reini Urban <rurban(at)x-ray(dot)at>
To: SehatRosny <SehatRosny(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-cygwin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres Database Design Issues in Tablespace
Date: 2004-12-06 16:34:30
Message-ID: 41B48A16.4020105@x-ray.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-cygwin

SehatRosny schrieb:
> Refering to 20 tables which can be partition
> A. All departments tables is put into 20 tables.
> some querying of 20 millions records.
>
> B. For each department create tablespace. (Which means, if there
> are 7000 departments, there will be 7000 tablespace each contains
> 20 tables).
> A1. Use A option,
> As tables become huge. partition the tables which hits often
> and has large size file(usually when it bigger than 2-3 GB size)
> into separate tablespace.
> B1. Use B option,
> Creating 7000 TableSpace for Departments
> - One Department has one tablespace
> - Each Department has 20 tables

> Question :
> 1. Is it B1 the right approach?
> 2. Is progresql will have problems if I have 7000 tablespace?

why tablespace at all? do some caclulation, buy a large disc and forget
about tablespace. (i.e. symlinks)

postgresql-cygwin certainly will have problems which such a
configuration. Please use a decent operating system and filesystem for
such a crazy idea.

cygwin is certainly not suited well for such a production database.
consider native windows or any unix instead.

NTFS is certainly not suited well for > 500 files per dir.
consider a unix filesystem instead.
--
Reini Urban
http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-cygwin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sehat Rosny 2004-12-06 16:49:59 Re: Postgres Database Design Issues in Tablespace
Previous Message SehatRosny 2004-12-06 10:33:48 Postgres Database Design Issues in Tablespace