Re: Alternate PostgreSQL.org Design

> Yes, that's how it should happen. But seeing as -advocacy decided to go
> and do their own website, and all we ever seem to get on this list from
> there is complaints and criticisms from people who clearly have't taken
> the time to check their facts before posting, I personally do not think
> they should be included in this. Now that is not a general criticism of
> the members of that list - many are *very* constructive community
> members. However, every time -advocacy get involved, we end up going
> round months old arguments again and again and get nowhere fast.

All due respect, but the whole www site is going nowhere fast in
general. I am on www, and I have seen no updates whatsoever about where
we are on the website, what tasks need to be completed, who is doing
them, estimated timelines...

or -- even a reminder to people of where to go to see these things if
they exist.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
> Regards, Dave.
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html

--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of PostgreSQL Replication, and plPHP.
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator. Integrated Replication for PostgreSQL