Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal

From: Ned Lilly <ned(at)nedscape(dot)com>
To: "Gavin M(dot) Roy" <gmr(at)ehpg(dot)net>
Cc: Omar Kilani <omar(at)tinysofa(dot)org>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, emily(at)tinysofa(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal
Date: 2004-10-27 16:46:01
Message-ID: 417FD0C9.3050406@nedscape.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www

I like it too, very much. Only question is, how does the design scale to 800x600, which should probably still be the minimum?

Gavin M. Roy wrote:

> I love it, it's very well done, professional, and fresh.
>
> Gavin
>
> Omar Kilani wrote:
>
>> Dear PostgreSQL Users and Developers,
>>
>> We would like to propose the following design as the basis for a new
>> postgresql.org.
>>
>> http://treehou.se/~emily/postgresql_design_proposal.png
>>
>> We are submitting this proposal as we, and many other users and
>> developers, feel that the current site portrays PostgreSQL in a less
>> than flattering light.
>>
>> Whilst the beta concept design is a great improvement upon the
>> existing site, we believe that our design proposal conveys a
>> professional image and portrays PostgreSQL as distinct amongst open
>> source projects that use a similar look and feel to the beta site.
>>
>> Additionally, this proposal focuses on reducing information overload,
>> providing a clean interface while simplifying and consolidating the
>> vast amount of material on the site.
>>
>> A survey of users and colleagues suggests that there may be interest
>> in adopting this design, and so, we would like to know if there is
>> interest amongst pgsql-www and pgsql-advocacy.
>>
>> We are willing to move forward with the design of the rest of the site
>> if there is some interest in our proposal. We estimate that full
>> migration and consolidation of current content and sites would take
>> approximately one month, if not less, using a content management
>> system to ease administration and maintenance. The main site can be
>> finished in line with the release of PostgreSQL 8, which I understand
>> is a couple of weeks away.
>>
>> Thanks for your time.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Omar Kilani
>> - and -
>> Emily Boyd
>>
>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marek Lewczuk 2004-10-27 17:08:03 Re: [SPAM] Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design
Previous Message Mitch Pirtle 2004-10-27 16:04:14 Re: PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marek Lewczuk 2004-10-27 17:08:03 Re: [SPAM] Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design
Previous Message Mitch Pirtle 2004-10-27 16:04:14 Re: PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal