Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Problem with pgfoundry ...

From: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>,"Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, gforge-admins(at)pgfoundry(dot)org,pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Problem with pgfoundry ...
Date: 2004-10-22 13:27:42
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-www
Robert Treat wrote:
> Do we need to start thinking of an alternative scheme for getting this out to 
> people? I'd imagine the loads we see now will pale in comparason to the loads 
> we see once the final release goes out. 

Maybe speaking to a few of the mirrors and trial/try having a:


area added to the mirror system, then have pgFoundry direct people to that.

It'd probably be a lot of extra disk space needed on the mirrors, thus 
my thought of someone speaking to a few of them first to see if they'd 
be interested.


Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift

In response to

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: John HansenDate: 2004-10-22 13:30:20
Subject: Re: Problem with pgfoundry ...
Previous:From: Robert TreatDate: 2004-10-22 13:20:59
Subject: Re: Problem with pgfoundry ...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group