Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: portal code changes

From: Alexey Borzov <borz_off(at)cs(dot)msu(dot)su>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: portal code changes
Date: 2004-10-21 06:08:55
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-www

Robert Treat wrote:
>>Well, as Magnus already pointed out, I just renamed "About" to "Overview".
>>I don't see the point of splitting it into "About" and "Using" --- we don't
>>yet have enough content to justify any splits. Some of the stuff should
>>probably end in the "documentation" section alongside the official docs,
> The difference in the two sections is that one is to keep advocacy oriented 
> material... stuff the someone who is trying to determine if postgresql is 
> good for them would need to know.  The other section is aimed more at people 
> who use postgresql everyday, or need to explore deeper into the different 
> options they have with postgresql.

Hey, *you* know anout the difference between "advocacy-oriented" and 
"user-oriented" content. But will the website users know it? That's the question 
you need to answer first. If there is no difference for them then there is no 
need to split.

>>You tell me what do you mean by "splitting", I tell you how feasible this
> I mean listing "regular" events seperate from "training" events, sort of like 
> we have news seperate from events now. 

OK, I could understand *that*. ;)

But *how* do you think they should be split: in display, in submit form, in 
admin interface, etc.?

In response to


pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Robert TreatDate: 2004-10-21 11:11:36
Subject: Re: portal code changes
Previous:From: World Wide Web OwnerDate: 2004-10-21 03:09:12
Subject: New News Entry

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group