Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: SpreadFirefox

From: Chris Travers <chris(at)metatrontech(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>,PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SpreadFirefox
Date: 2004-10-20 05:27:10
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
Joshua D. Drake wrote:

>> If Firefox decided to drop the XML configuration storage approach in
>> favor of using a (perhaps quasi-embedded, in the way it _could_ be
>> done) PostgreSQL instance, that would be a good excuse.
> IMHO that is a bad use for PostgreSQL and a better use for SQLite. 
> PostgreSQL is a farily
> heavy process to be a book mark manager.
I have actually thought that a gconf backend using a transactional store 
might be nice.  Especially for network administration of desktops...  
PostgreSQL might be nice for this.  How it would compare to LDAP, I 
don't know though....

Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
Metatron Technology Consulting

Attachment: chris.vcf
Description: text/x-vcard (127 bytes)

In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Alexey BorzovDate: 2004-10-20 06:54:33
Subject: Re: SpreadFirefox
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2004-10-20 03:59:39
Subject: Re: SpreadFirefox

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group