| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> | 
|---|---|
| To: | "Dan Boeriu" <dan(dot)boeriu(at)roost(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Craig Ringer" <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>, "PostgreSQL bugs" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> | 
| Subject: | Re: BUG #4945: Parallel update(s) gone wild | 
| Date: | 2009-07-30 21:34:48 | 
| Message-ID: | 4174.1248989688@sss.pgh.pa.us | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs | 
"Dan Boeriu" <dan(dot)boeriu(at)roost(dot)com> writes:
> Attached is the reproducible test case - I was able to reproduce the problem on 32 and 64 bit 8.3.6 and 8.4.0 RedHat 5.3 kernel 2.6.18-128.1.16.el5 #1 SMP
I looked at this a bit.  It's the same issue discussed at
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2008-09/msg00045.php
namely, that the second update finds itself trying to update a large
number of tuples that were already updated since its snapshot was taken.
That means it has to re-verify that the updated versions of those tuples
meet its WHERE qualification.  That's done by a function EvalPlanQual
that's pretty darn inefficient for complex queries like this one.
It's essentially redoing the join (and recomputing the whole sub-SELECT)
for each row that needs to be updated.
Someday I'd like us to redesign that mechanism, but don't hold
your breath ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dan Boeriu | 2009-07-30 22:11:39 | Re: BUG #4945: Parallel update(s) gone wild | 
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2009-07-30 18:45:30 | Re: fix: plpgsql: return query and dropped columns problem |