Re: Index locking considerations

From: Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Index locking considerations
Date: 2004-09-30 22:14:20
Message-ID: 415C853C.2050806@bigfoot.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> I've been thinking more about Gaetano Mendola's report of a
> FlushRelationBuffers failure during VACUUM FULL. I still don't see how
> that could happen in 7.4, but I do see a real related risk in 8.0.

Just another information that could help your analysis.

The index's parent is a table that implement a "materialized view" so is
heavily updated by triggers.

Regards
Gaetano Mendola

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-09-30 22:46:54 obscure plperl bug
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2004-09-30 21:57:37 Re: Reviving Time Travel (was Re: 'TID index')