Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>,Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>,Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>,Grant Finnemore <grantf(at)guruhut(dot)co(dot)za>,pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1
Date: 2004-09-24 15:15:22
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> I believe you are correct for Oracle at least.
> But for people porting over from MSSQL it is a *huge* deal, and given 
> the native windows port of Postgres with 8.0.0, I predict *many* 
> requests for this in upcoming months.
Speaking from a commercial perspective. I have had, in the last 60 days 
over a dozen inquiries of how PostgreSQL 8.0 on WINDOWS compares to 
MSSQL. The specific question
topics have been:

1. Reliability
2. Performance
3. High Availability
4. Features

Anything that we can do, within reason to help the migration from MSSQL 
to PostgreSQL "is a good thing" (tm).


Joshua D. Drake

> Joe
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if 
> your
>      joining column's datatypes do not match

Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com -
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Thomas HallgrenDate: 2004-09-24 15:17:13
Subject: Re: Use of zlib
Previous:From: Joe ConwayDate: 2004-09-24 15:08:15
Subject: Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group