Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> OK, but keep in mind if we use synchronized_seqscans in pg_dump we will
> have to recognize that GUC forever.
No, because it's being used on the query side, not in the emitted dump.
We have *never* promised that pg_dump version N could dump from server
version N+1 .., in fact, personally I'd like to make that case be a hard
error, rather than something people could override with -i.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2008-01-31 05:45:40|
|Subject: Re: Oops - BF:Mastodon just died |
|Previous:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2008-01-31 03:18:03|
|Subject: Re: Oops - BF:Mastodon just died|
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Decibel!||Date: 2008-01-31 07:28:24|
|Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Better default_statistics_target|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2008-01-31 02:15:35|
|Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning