Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: "Idle in Transaction" revisited.

From: Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jeffrey Tenny <jeffrey(dot)tenny(at)comcast(dot)net>,postgres jdbc <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: "Idle in Transaction" revisited.
Date: 2004-09-18 22:16:48
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-jdbc
Tom Lane wrote:
> Jeffrey Tenny <jeffrey(dot)tenny(at)comcast(dot)net> writes:
>>Are you saying that I will see stale database state at the logical 
>>"start" of my transaction from a pooled connection?
>>That's a showstopper for sure. If I'm confused please enlighten me.
> Apparently you are confused, because the JDBC behavior has always
> been like that; it's only the current devel driver that fixes it.

That's not entirely true; 7.3-era drivers (which I think is what is 
being used here) used "set autocommit" rather than explicit BEGIN. It 
went back to using BEGIN again when 7.4 removed that option.


In response to

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Oliver JowettDate: 2004-09-18 22:21:16
Subject: Re: "Idle in Transaction" revisited.
Previous:From: John R PierceDate: 2004-09-18 22:08:53
Subject: Re: Issues regarding code license of ported code.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group