Tom Lane wrote:
> Jeffrey Tenny <jeffrey(dot)tenny(at)comcast(dot)net> writes:
>>Are you saying that I will see stale database state at the logical
>>"start" of my transaction from a pooled connection?
>>That's a showstopper for sure. If I'm confused please enlighten me.
> Apparently you are confused, because the JDBC behavior has always
> been like that; it's only the current devel driver that fixes it.
That's not entirely true; 7.3-era drivers (which I think is what is
being used here) used "set autocommit" rather than explicit BEGIN. It
went back to using BEGIN again when 7.4 removed that option.
In response to
pgsql-jdbc by date
|Next:||From: Oliver Jowett||Date: 2004-09-18 22:21:16|
|Subject: Re: "Idle in Transaction" revisited.|
|Previous:||From: John R Pierce||Date: 2004-09-18 22:08:53|
|Subject: Re: Issues regarding code license of ported code.|