Re: "Idle in Transaction" revisited.

From: Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
Subject: Re: "Idle in Transaction" revisited.
Date: 2004-09-18 10:35:18
Message-ID: 414C0F66.7090507@bigfoot.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

John R Pierce wrote:

> I'm curious what common practice is for threads that do nothing but
> SELECTS... do folks just enable auto_commit, thereby preventing pgJDBC
> from doing BEGIN; ? Do they lace their code with COMMIT() calls?

We were bitten by this problem too, and my solution was to suggest our
developer to do and explicit: "ABORT" after the connection, and do
explicit "BEGIN" "END" instead of rely on the jdbc interface.

Regards
Gaetano Mendola

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oliver Jowett 2004-09-18 10:53:26 Re: "Idle in Transaction" revisited.
Previous Message Kris Jurka 2004-09-18 07:24:28 Re: "Idle in Transaction" revisited.