From: | David Garamond <lists(at)zara(dot)6(dot)isreserved(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: olympics ranking query |
Date: | 2004-08-20 17:27:43 |
Message-ID: | 4126348F.2090604@zara.6.isreserved.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 23:40:08 +0700,
> David Garamond <lists(at)zara(dot)6(dot)isreserved(dot)com> wrote:
>
>>Challenge question: is there a simpler way to do query #1 (without any
>>PL, and if possible without sequences too?
>
> You could use a subselect to count how many countries had a lower
> medal ranking and add 1 to get the rank. This should be a lot more standard
> than using sequences. It will probably be a little slower, but for tables
> of that size it shouldn't be a big deal.
Thanks for the tip. This is what I came up with:
select
(select count(*) from countrymedal c1 where
c1.gold>c2.gold or
(c1.gold=c2.gold and (c1.silver>c2.silver or
(c1.silver=c2.silver and c1.bronze>c2.bronze))))+1 as rank,
count(*) as numranker,
gold, silver, bronze
from countrymedal c2
group by gold, silver, bronze
order by rank;
--
dave
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mischa Sandberg | 2004-08-20 18:29:38 | Re: olympics ranking query |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-20 17:21:08 | Re: olympics ranking query |