| From: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Raphaël Enrici <blacknoz(at)club-internet(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pgadmin3 not compliant with gcc-3.4 (?) |
| Date: | 2004-08-15 13:32:45 |
| Message-ID: | 411F65FD.6070508@pse-consulting.de |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Raphaël Enrici wrote:
>
>
> Seems gcc team does not agree...
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11174
> They are the ones coming to the conclusion quoted before.
>
> Can you tell me where I can find the C++ spec they are all talking about
> please ?
http://www.csci.csusb.edu/dick/c++std/cd2/index.html
AFAIK the original ansi specs are not available without horrible fees, I
hope the link above contains accurate data.
Apparently, the spec *does* specify this brain dead restriction.
We have three alternatives to fix that:
- declare OnChange public. Maybe I should rearrange my knowledge to drop
the 'protected' keyword completely.
- Invent an intermediate class empty class above the current dlgProperty
without any methods just to create an accessible target.
- deny 3.4 support
Regards,
Andreas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2004-08-15 13:43:14 | 8.0 doc |
| Previous Message | cvs | 2004-08-15 12:41:43 | CVS Commit by andreas: weird spec workaround for gcc 3.4 |